Impacto de las fracturas por fragilidad en mujeres españolas con osteoporosis posmenopáusica / Impact of fragility fractures in postmenopausal Spanish women with osteoporosis

Objetivo: dada la repercusión que tienen las fracturas por fragilidad y sus secuelas en la vida de las mujeres con osteoporosis posmenopáusica (OPM), el objetivo de este estudio es describir y analizar su impacto en esta población. Material y métodos: se realizó una encuesta a mujeres posmenopáusicas con fractura por fragilidad en un diseño observacional transversal. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, impacto de la fractura (necesidad de cuidados, productividad laboral), calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS, mediante cuestionario QUALEFFO-31) y disposición a pagar (DAP) por recuperarla. Resultados: participaron 120 mujeres, promedio de edad 62 ± 7 años. Las fracturas más frecuentes fueron las de radio distal (29,9 %) y las vertebrales (21,3 %). Un 53,3 % necesitó cuidados durante su recuperación (76,5 % informales; 24,9 % formales) y un 4,2 % tuvo que ingresar en un centro/residencia sociosanitaria. De aquellas que trabajaban cuando se produjo la fractura (62,5 %), el 56 % vio su vida laboral afectada (69,3 % incapacidad temporal; 17,3 % incapacidad permanente; 10,7 % reducción de jornada; 10,7 % abandono laboral; 5,3 % permiso/excedencia; 3,6 % prejubilación). El impacto de la fractura se debió principalmente al dolor (71,7 %), dificultad para realizar actividades cotidianas (48,3 %), problemas de movilidad (46,7 %) y estado emocional (41,7 %). La mayor DAP se ofreció por recuperar la capacidad para realizar actividades cotidianas y el estado emocional. La puntuación total QUALEFFO-31 (0-100) fue 49,9 ± 10,8 (función mental: 68,3 ± 7,3; dolor: 56 ± 22,6; función física: 39,3 ± 15,5). Conclusiones: las fracturas por fragilidad tienen un alto impacto en la calidad de vida de las mujeres con OPM. Resulta fundamental poner en valor aquellos aspectos que más les preocupan para optimizar su abordaje. (AU)

Objective: Given the impact of fragility fractures and their consequences on the lives of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), the objective of this study is to describe and analyze the impact of this kind of fractures on this population. Materials and methods: A survey was conducted among postmenopausal women with fragility fractures in a cross-sectional observational design. Sociodemographic variables, fracture impact (need for care, work productivity), and data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL, assessed using the QUALEFFO-31 questionnaire), and willingness to pay (WTP) to regain HRQoL were collected. Results: A total of 120 women participated, with a mean age of 62 ± 7 years. The most frequent fractures described were distal radius fractures (29.9 %), followed by vertebral fractures (21.3 %). A total of 53.3 % required care during their recovery (76.5 %, informal; 24.9 %, formal), and 4.2 % had to be admitted to a health care or nursing home. Among those who were working when the fracture occurred (62.5 %), 56 % had their working life affected (69.3 %, temporary disability; 17.3 %, permanent disability; 10.7 %, reduced working hours; 10.7 %, quit their jobs; 5.3 %, leave of absence; and 3.6 %, early retirement). The impact of the fracture was primarily due to pain (71.7 %), difficulty performing activities of daily living (48.3 %), mobility problems (46.7 %), and emotional state (41.7 %). The highest WTP was offered to regain the ability to perform activities of daily living and improve the emotional state. The overall QUALEFFO-31 score (0-100) was 49.9 ± 10.8 (mental function, 68.3 ± 7.3; pain, 56 ± 22.6; physical function, 39.3 ± 15.5). Conclusions: Fragility fractures play a significant role on the quality of life of women with PMO. It is of paramount importance to value the aspects that concern them the most to optimize their management. (AU)

Active identification of vertebral fracture in the FLS model of care.

The identification of vertebral fracture is a key point in an FLS. We have analyzed the characteristics of 570 patients according to the route of identification (referral by other doctors, emergency registry or through VFA), concluding that promoting referral by other doctors with a training campaign is effective. PURPOSE: Vertebral fractures (VF) are associated with increased risk of further VFs. Our objective was to analyze the characteristics of patients with VF seen in a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). METHODS: An observational study was carried out on patients with VF referred to the outpatient metabolic clinic (OMC) after a training campaign, identified in the emergency registry, and captured by VF assessment with bone densitometry (DXA-VFA) in patients with non-VFs. Patients with traumatic VF or VF > 1 year, infiltrative or neoplastic disease were excluded. The number and severity of VFs (Genant) were analyzed. Treatment initiation in the first 6 months after baseline visit was reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, 570 patients were included, mean age 73. The most common route for identifying VF was through referral to OMC (303 cases), followed by the emergency registry (198) and DXA-VFA (69). Osteoporosis by DXA was found in 312 (58%) patients and 259 (45%) had ≥ 2 VFs. The rate of grade 3 VFs was highest among patients on the emergency registry. Those identified through OMC had a higher number of VFs, a higher rate of osteoporosis, more risk factors and greater treatment initiation. Patients with VFs detected by DXA-VFA were mostly women with a single VF and had a lower rate of osteoporosis by DXA. CONCLUSIONS: We present the distribution of VFs by the route of identification in an FLS. Promoting referral by other doctors with a training campaign may help in the quality improvement of the FLS-based model of care.

High incidence of clinical fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. A case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of clinical fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and analyze risk factors for fracture. METHODS: Incidence of clinical fragility fractures in 330 postmenopausal women with RA was compared to that of a control population of 660 age-matched postmenopausal Spanish women. Clinical fractures during the previous five years were recorded. We analyzed associations with risk factors for fracture in both populations and with disease-related variables in RA patients. RESULTS: Median age of RA patients was 64 years; median RA duration was eight years. Sixty-nine percent were in remission or on low activity. Eighty-five percent had received glucocorticoids (GCs); 85 %, methotrexate; and 40 %, ≥1 biologic DMARD. Fifty-four patients and 47 controls had ≥1 major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Incidence of MOFs was 3.55 per 100 patient-year in patients and 0.72 in controls (HR: 2.6). Risk factors for MOFs in RA patients were age, previous fracture, parental hip fracture, years since menopause, BMD, erosions, disease activity and disability, and cumulative dose of GCs. Previous fracture in RA patients was a strong risk for MOFs (HR: 10.37). CONCLUSION: Of every 100 postmenopausal Spanish women with RA, 3-4 have a MOF per year. This is more than double that of the general population. A previous fracture poses a high risk for a new fracture. Other classic risk factors for fracture, RA disease activity and disability, and the cumulative dose of GCs are associated with fracture development.

Implications of FRAX® adjusted for recent fracture on the indication of treatment in an FLS.

We analyzed the practical consequences of applying an adjusted FRAX® for recent fractures in a FLS. After analyzing 2777 patients, we concluded that the adjusted FRAX® is irrelevant when calculating FRAX® with DXA and is only useful for fractures of the humerus when DXA is not available. PURPOSE: A FRAX® adjusted to fractures less than 2 years old has been proposed. The objective of this work was to analyze the clinical implications of applying the adjusted FRAX® instead of the classic FRAX® in a fracture liaison service (FLS) unit. METHODS: Adults aged 50 years or older with fragility fractures (hip, spine, humerus, and forearm) that occurred in the 12 months prior to the baseline visit were included. We recorded demographic data, type of fracture, DXA, classic FRAX®, and FRAX® adjusted for recent fractures and indications for anti-osteoporotic medication (AOM) following the guidelines of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. RESULTS: A total of 2777 patients were included, mean age 73 years, 84% women. The type of fracture was as follows: forearm (n = 958; 34.5%), hip (n = 781; 28.1%), humerus (n = 642; 23.1%), and spine (n = 397, 14.3%). DXA was performed in 2134 cases (76.8%). A total of 2522 patients (90.8%) were candidates for AOM (100% involving the hip and spine, 83% forearm, and 85% humerus). FRAX®-hip ≥ 3% increased from 1601 to 1775 cases (57.6 to 64%). The average FRAX®-hip (SD) increased from 5.7 (6) to 7.5 (9) (4.6 to 8.8 in males and 5.9 to 7.3 in females). The percentage of forearm fracture candidates for AOM, with or without DXA, did not change after FRAX®-hip adjustment, while the number of patients with humerus fractures increased from 59 to 80% in those who did not have DXA. In the entire sample, FRAX®-adjusted led to an indication of AOM for 15 additional patients (0.5% of major fractures): 14 with a humerus fracture and 1 with a forearm fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The adjusted FRAX® for recent fractures in an FLS unit in an adjusted FRAX® is irrelevant when calculating FRAX® with DXA; in fact, it is only useful for fractures of the humerus when DXA is not available.

Long-term persistence of treatment after hip fracture in a fracture liaison service.

Long-term adherence to antiosteoporosis medication (AOM) in the setting of a fracture liaison service (FLS) are not well known. Patients ≥ 50 with hip fracture seen in an FLS and recommended for treatment to prevent new fractures were analyzed. Baseline data included demographics, identification mode, previous treatment and FRAX items. Patient records were reviewed 3-8 years later, and these data were collected: (1) survival; (2) major refracture; (3) initiation of treatment, proportion of days covered (PDC) and persistence with AOM. 372 patients (mean age, 79 years; 76% women) were included. Mean follow-up was 47 months, 52 patients (14%) had a refracture (22 hip) and 129 (34.5%) died. AOM was started in 283 patients (76.0%). Factors associated with initiation of AOM were previous use of bisphosphonate (OR 9.94; 95% CI 1.29-76.32) and a lower T-score lumbar (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65-0.99). Persistence decreased to 72.6%, 60% and 47% at 12, 36 and 60 months. A PDC > 80% was confirmed in 208 patients (55.7%) and associated with previous use of bisphosphonate (OR 3.38; 95% CI 1.34-8.53), treatment with denosumab (OR 2.69; 95% CI:1.37-5.27), and inpatient identification (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.18-4.34). Long-term persistence with AOM was optimal in patients with hip fracture seen at an FLS. A PDC > 80% was associated with inpatient identification and prescription of denosumab.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fracture Liaison Services Compared with Standard of Care in the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Spain.

Purpose: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) compared with standard care for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Spain. Methods: Patients with osteoporosis and an initial fragility fracture who were candidates to initiate osteoporosis treatment (mean age 65 years, 90.7% female) were included in the model. Disease progression was simulated with a Markov model through seven health states (with and without osteoporosis treatment, subsequent hip, vertebral, forearm and humerus fracture, and death). A time horizon of 10 years and a 6-month duration per cycle was set. Clinical, economic, and quality of life parameters were estimated from the literature and Spanish clinical practice. Resource use and treatment patterns were validated by an expert panel. The Spanish National Health System (SNS) perspective was adopted, taking direct costs (€; 2020) into account. Effectiveness was measured in life-years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years gained (QALYs). A discount rate of 3% was applied to costs and outcomes. The uncertainty of the parameters was assessed using deterministic, scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (1000 iterations). Results: Setting up a FLS for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Spain would provide better osteoporosis treatment initiation and persistence. This would reduce subsequent fragility fractures, disutilities and deaths. FLS would have greater clinical benefits (0.008 and 0.082 LYG and QALY gained per patient, respectively) and higher costs (€563.69 per patient) compared with standard care, leading to an incremental cost-utility ratio of €6855.23 per QALY gained over the 10 years horizon. The sensitivity analyses showed limited dispersion of the base case results, corroborating their robustness. Conclusion: From the SNS perspective and considering Spanish willingness-to-pay thresholds, the introduction of FLS for the secondary prevention of fragility fractures would be a cost-effective strategy.

Self-expandable metal stents versus endoscopic balloon dilation for the treatment of strictures in Crohn's disease (ProtDilat study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the established endoscopic treatment for short strictures in Crohn's disease. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) have been used for endoscopic treatment of patients for whom EBD was unsuccessful. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of the two endoscopic treatments in patients with Crohn's disease with stenosis and compare the mean cost of both treatments. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised trial was done in 19 tertiary and secondary hospitals in Spain. Patients with Crohn's disease with obstructive symptoms and predominantly fibrotic strictures of less than 10 cm in length were eligible for inclusion. We excluded patients with stenosis treated with SEMS or EBD in the previous year and stenosis not accessible to a colonoscope. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either EBD (EBD group) or FCSEMS (FCSEMS group) using a digital en-block randomisation system (block size of four). In the EBD group, dilation was done with a CRE Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) pneumatic balloon with the diameter set at the discretion of the endoscopist; a maximum of two sessions of dilation were allowed with a minimum interval of 15-30 days between them. In the FCSEMS group, a 20 mm diameter Taewoong (Gimpo-si, South Korea) fully covered metal stent was placed; stent length was set at the discretion of the endoscopist. The primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of the endoscopic treatment, defined by the proportion of patients free of a new therapeutic intervention (EBD, FCSEMS, or surgery) due to symptomatic recurrence at 1 year of follow-up. Patients were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Adverse events were recorded for all the patients; events were considered associated to be with the procedure when a causal association was possible, probable, or definite. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02395354. FINDINGS: From Aug 28, 2013, to Oct 9, 2017, we assessed the eligibility of 99 patients, of whom 19 (19%) patients were excluded. Thus, 80 (81%) patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 39 (49%) patients to the FCSEMS group and 41 (51%) patients to the EBD group. 33 (80%) of 41 patients in the EBD group and 20 (51%) of 39 patients in the FCSEMS group were free of a new therapeutic intervention at 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 3·9 [95% CI 1·4-10·6]; p=0·0061). Two (3%) of 80 patients had severe adverse events (one [2%] patient in the EBD group and one [3%] patient in the FCSEMS group); both patients had perforations. INTERPRETATION: EBD is more effective than FCSEMS for Crohn's disease strictures, with a good safety profile for both treatments. FUNDING: Spanish National Institute of Health, Foundation of Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy, Catalan Society of Gastroenterology, and Taweoong.

Enfoque organizativo y clínico de la osteoporosis en reumatología: encuesta y consenso OP-SER-Excellence / Organisational and Clinical Approach to Osteoporosis in Rheumatology: OP-SER-Excellence Survey and Consensus

Introducción: Los estudios de opinión sobre la percepción del reumatólogo de la práctica asistencial en osteoporosis (OP) pueden ayudar a identificar áreas de mejora en la gestión de esta patología. Objetivo: Conocer y analizar el enfoque organizativo que adoptan los reumatólogos españoles ante la OP para definir prioridades estratégicas y establecer unos estándares de calidad. Material y método: Un grupo de expertos diseñó una encuesta sobre creencias y conductas en OP en la práctica del reumatólogo. La encuesta se remitió a los socios de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER). Mediante ronda Delphi se consensuaron las prioridades estratégicas en OP. Resultados: El grupo de expertos consensuó como prioridades estratégicas en OP: 1) La SER debería impulsar la inclusión de la OP en el conjunto de prestaciones de todos los servicios de reumatología, así como ampliar la oferta formativa específica para médicos y enfermeras; 2) Los servicios de reumatología debieran fomentar el papel de la enfermera en OP, impulsar la implantación y el seguimiento de indicadores de calidad e implantar protocolos de derivación consensuados con atención primaria además de impulsar su formación en esta área; 3) La SER y los servicios de reumatología deberían impulsar la implantación de la consulta electrónica y la consulta monográfica o dedicada a OP así como la participación del reumatólogo en unidades de fractura, Fracture Liaison Service. Conclusiones: Las prioridades estratégicas en OP derivadas de la encuesta a los reumatólogos españoles ayudan a identificar las áreas de mejora a nivel organizativo, estructural y de estándares de calidad en esta patología.(AU)

Objective: To determine and analyse the organisational approach adopted by Spanish rheumatologists to osteoporosis (OP) to define strategic priorities. Material and method: A group of experts designed a questionnaire on OP in the rheumatologist practice. The survey was sent to the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) members. Through the Delphi round, strategic priorities were agreed upon in OP. Results: The priorities are: 1) The SER should promote the inclusion of OP in 100% of the services and expand the training offer; 2) Rheumatology services should promote the role of the nurse in OP, promote quality indicators and referral protocols agreed with primary care in addition to promoting their training in this area; 3) The SER and Rheumatology services should promote electronic consultation, OP monographic clinics and participation in Fracture Liaison Service units. Conclusions: Strategic priorities in OP help identify areas of improvement at organisational, structural and quality standards level in this pathology.(AU)

Fracture liaison service model: treatment persistence 5 years later.

We analyzed the long-term persistence of treatment in a FLS. During follow-up, 15.2% of patients had a refracture and 23.8% died. At the 5-year checkup, 74% had started treatment (associated with female sex, previous use of bisphosphonate, and referral to an osteoporosis clinic). Persistence at 1 and 5 years was 70.6% and 46.5%, respectively. INTRODUCTION: To analyze the long-term persistence of treatment in a fracture liaison service (FLS). METHODS: Patients ≥ 50 years with a fragility fracture attended between 2012 and 2016 who were recommended for treatment to prevent new fractures were included. Baseline data included demographics, type of fracture, previous treatment, and FRAX® items. Five years later, patient records were reviewed and the following data were collected: [1] survival; [2] refracture; [3] initiation of treatment, persistence, and medication possession ratio (MPR) > 80%. RESULTS: We included 888 patients, mean age 75 years, 83% women, and mean follow-up 56 months. During follow-up, 135 patients (15.2%) had a refracture (109 major fractures, 50 hip refractures) and 212 patients died (23.8%); at the 5-year checkup, 657 patients (74%) had started some type of treatment. Factors associated with the start of treatment were female sex (OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.42-3.11), previous use of bisphosphonate (OR 3.91; 95% CI: 2.23-6.86), and referral to an osteoporosis clinic (OR 1.46; 95% CI: 1.02-2.07). Persistence decreased from 70.6% at 12 months to 46.5% at 60 months. An MPR > 80% was confirmed in 449 patients, 68.3% of whom were under treatment. A total of 521 and 447 patients received treatment for at least 24 and 36 months, respectively (79.3% and 68.0% of those who started treatment). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with fragility fractures attended at an FLS showed optimal long-term persistence of treatment. These data can help healthcare managers better calculate the cost-effectiveness of implementing the FLS model.

Organisational and Clinical Approach to Osteoporosis in Rheumatology: OP-SER-Excellence Survey and Consensus. / Enfoque organizativo y clínico de la osteoporosis en reumatología: encuesta y consenso OP-SER-Excellence.

OBJECTIVE: To determine and analyse the organisational approach adopted by Spanish rheumatologists to osteoporosis (OP) to define strategic priorities. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A group of experts designed a questionnaire on OP in the rheumatologist practice. The survey was sent to the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) members. Through the Delphi round, strategic priorities were agreed upon in OP. RESULTS: The priorities are: 1) The SER should promote the inclusion of OP in 100% of the services and expand the training offer; 2) Rheumatology services should promote the role of the nurse in OP, promote quality indicators and referral protocols agreed with primary care in addition to promoting their training in this area; 3) The SER and Rheumatology services should promote electronic consultation, OP monographic clinics and participation in Fracture Liaison Service units. CONCLUSIONS: Strategic priorities in OP help identify areas of improvement at organisational, structural and quality standards level in this pathology.

Patrones de tratamiento biológico en pacientes con enfermedades articulares inflamatorias. Estudio retrospectivo de 4 años de seguimiento / Biological treatment patterns in patients with inflammatory joint diseases. Retrospective study with 4 years follow-up

OBJETIVO: Describir el manejo terapéutico de la artritis reumatoide (AR), la artritis psoriásica (Aps) y la espondilitis anquilosante (EA) en pacientes que inician tratamiento con agentes biológicos. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, longitudinal en 33 hospitales españoles. Se incluyeron pacientes con AR, Aps y EA que iniciaron tratamiento con agentes biológicos entre septiembre de 2009 y agosto de 2010, con un seguimiento de más de 3 años. Se analizaron las características clínico-demográficas, los fármacos, la supervivencia de la terapia biológica y las causas de cambio o interrupción. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 463 pacientes (183 AR, 119 Aps y 161 EA) con un seguimiento medio de 3,8 años. Al final del seguimiento una elevada proporción continuaba con el primer biológico prescrito (41,0% de AR, 59,7% de Aps y 51,6% de EA), precisando ajustes de dosis el 31,1%, 47,9% y 42,9% de pacientes con AR, Aps y EA, respectivamente. Hubo interrupción temporal en el 8,2%, 8,4% y 15,5% de los pacientes y se precisó cambio de biológico en el 37,7%, 26,1% y 24,2%. La interrupción definitiva ocurrió en el 13,1%, 5,9% y 8,7% de pacientes con AR, Aps y EA, respectivamente. El tiempo medio de cambio o interrupción fue de 30,1 meses para la AR y de 35,7 meses para la Aps y la EA. CONCLUSIONES: Nuestros resultados sugieren que, en la práctica, la mitad de los pacientes con AR y 2/3 con Aps o EA continúan con el primer biológico, pero con frecuentes ajustes de tratamiento

OBJECTIVES: To describe the therapeutic management of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) in patients initiating treatment with biological agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective, longitudinal study in 33 Spanish hospitals. Patients with RA, PsA and AS starting treatment with biological agents between September 2009 and August 2010 and a follow-up longer than 3 years were included. Clinical-demographic characteristics, drugs, biological therapy survival, and reasons for discontinuation or switching were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-three patients were included (183 RA, 119 PsA and 161 AS), with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. At the end of follow-up, a high proportion continued with the first biological prescribed (41.0% of RA, 59.7% of PsA and 51.6% of AS), 31.1%, 47.9% and 42.9% of RA, PsA and AS patients requiring dosage adjustments, respectively. There was temporary discontinuation in 8.2%, 8.4% and 15.5% of patients, and a switch of biologic agent was required in 37.7%, 26.1% and 24.2%. Definitive discontinuation occurred in 13.1%, 5.9% and 8.7% of RA, PsA and AS patients, respectively. Mean time to discontinuation or switching was 30.1 months for RA and 35.7 months for PsA and AS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, in practice, half of patients with RA and two thirds with PsA or AS maintained the first biological, but with frequent dose adjustments

Digestive involvement in primary Sjögren's syndrome: analysis from the Sjögrenser registry.

OBJECTIVES: Digestive involvement (DI) has been reported in 10-30% of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) patients, and few studies have systematically analysed the prevalence of DI in pSS patients. The aim of this study was to describe DI prevalence in pSS patients from the Sjögrenser Study, and to analyse its clinical associations. METHODS: All patients included in the Sjögrenser study, a Spanish multicentre randomised cohort, containing demographic, clinical and histologic data, have been analysed retrospectively. Patients were classified according to the presence of DI (oesophageal, gastric, intestinal, hepatic and pancreatic), and we have performed DI clinical associations, descriptive statistics, Student t or χ2 test, and uni and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: From 437 included patients, 95% were women, with a median age of 58 years, 71 (16.2%) presented DI: 21 (29.5%) chronic atrophic gastritis, 12 (16.9%) oesophageal motility dysfunction, 3 (4.2%) lymphocytic colitis, 18 (25.3%) primary biliary cholangitis, 15 (21.1%) autoimmune hepatitis, 7 (9.8%) pancreatic involvement and 5 (7%) coeliac disease. Half of them developed DI at the same time or after pSS diagnosis. Patients with DI were significantly older at pSS diagnosis (p=0.032), more frequently women (p=0.009), presented more autoimmune hypothyroidism and C3 hypocomplementaemia (p=0.040), and were treated more frequently with glucocorticoids, immunosuppressant and biologic therapies. Patients with pancreatic involvement presented more central nervous system and renal involvement, Raynaud's phenomenon, lymphoma and C3/C4 hypocomplementaemia. CONCLUSIONS: DI is frequent in Sjögrenser patients, mainly in the form of autoimmune disorders, and seem to be associated with a more severe phenotype. Our results suggest that DI should be evaluated in pSS patients, especially those with more severe disease.

Prognostic factors for sustained remission in a "real life" cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients / Factores pronósticos para la remisión sostenida en una cohorte de "vida real" de pacientes con artritis reumatoide

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most frequent chronic polyarthritis. The current goal of RA treatment is to achieve clinical remission. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of remission in a cohort of patients from clinical practice, and to identify potentially modifiable factors associated with remission. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on a cohort of RA patients seen at the first consultation at the HUGC Rheumatology Service Dr. Negrín (HUGCDN) between first of January 2000 and thirtieth of April 2014. Sustained remission was defined as DAS28 less than 2.6 in the last two available visits in the medical history. RESULTS: A total of 463 patients were consecutively included, most (75%) women, with a mean age at the onset of RA of 50 years and a mean duration of the disease at follow-up of 8 years. 46% of the patients achieved sustained remission. Multiple logistic regression analyses found male sex (P=.031, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.05-2.82), diagnosis in the first year of symptoms (P=.023, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.07-2.69) and the initial DAS28 (P=.035) to be independent predictors for sustained remission. CONCLUSIONS: The 46% of the patients with RA followed in the HUGC Dr. Negrín are in persistent remission, being the early diagnosis a modifiable factor predictor of remission. Thus, an objective of the Rheumatology Service should be to improve the diagnostic delay of RA in the health area

INTRODUCCIÓN: La artritis reumatoide (AR) es la poliartritis crónica más frecuente. El objetivo actual del tratamiento de la AR es lograr la remisión clínica. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia de la remisión en una cohorte de pacientes de la práctica clínica, e identificar factores potencialmente modificables asociados con la remisión. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en una cohorte de pacientes con AR observada en la primera consulta del Servicio de Reumatología del Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín (HUGCDN) entre el primero de enero de 2000 y el 30 de abril de 2014. La remisión mantenida se definió como DAS28 menor de 2,6 en las 2 últimas visitas recogidas en la historia clínica. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron consecutivamente 463 pacientes, la mayoría (75%) mujeres, con una edad media al inicio de la AR de 50 años y la duración media de la enfermedad en el seguimiento de 8 años. El 46% de los pacientes alcanzaron la remisión sostenida. Los análisis de regresión logística múltiple encontraron que el sexo masculino (p = 0,031; OR: 1,7; IC del 95%: 1,05-2,82), el diagnóstico en el primer año de síntomas (p = 0,023; OR: 1,7; IC del 95%: 1,07-2,69) y el DAS28 inicial (p = 0,035) fueron factores predictores independientes de remisión sostenida. CONCLUSIONES: El 46% de los pacientes con AR seguidos en el HUGCDN están en remisión persistente, siendo el diagnóstico precoz un factor predictor modificable de la remisión. Así, un objetivo del servicio de reumatología debe ser mejorar el retraso diagnóstico de la AR en el área de salud

The evolution of an FLS in search of excellence: the experience of Gran Canaria.

We present the achievements and difficulties of our pioneering FLS within the Spanish public health system over an 8-year period. Despite implementing consolidating measures at the unit, the addition of a support nurse, the establishment of a solid alliance with primary care, the involvement of primary care nurses, and starting initial prescriptions at the hospital are pending. PURPOSE: To assess the consolidation of an FLS after its implementation as well as the problems that have arisen over time. METHODS: The program for secondary fracture prevention was implemented in 2012. Initially manned by the same staff assigned to the rheumatology department, a part-time support nurse was added in 2016. Patients were identified from the emergency registry and, more recently, from among those admitted for hip fracture and treated in a monographic osteoporosis clinic. The baseline visit consisted of a consultation with the nurse, as well as DXA and bone metabolism analytics. Patients were referred to their primary care physician to start treatment. RESULTS: Of the 2416 attended patients, 30% presented forearm fractures, 27% hip, 20% humerus, 10% spine, and 11% other fractures. In comparison with 2012, in 2019, the monthly average of patients had doubled, with an increased in the number of hip and spine fractures and an increase in the percentage of captured patients. The performance of DXA fell from 100 to 52%, and fewer patients were referred to the osteoporosis clinic. One in four patients was referred to a fall prevention school. Despite implementing consolidating measures at the unit (the addition of a support nurse and the establishment of a solid alliance with primary care), the involvement of primary care nurses and starting initial prescriptions at the hospital are pending. CONCLUSIONS: We present herein the achievements made by our FLS and the difficulties within the Spanish public health system over an 8-year period.

Comparable effects of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased premature prevalence of atherosclerosis. We aimed to determine whether there are differences in the prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors between SLE and RA. We also analysed the effect of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on the development of subclinical atherosclerosis in both conditions and if some disease-characteristic features are associated with these traditional cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study encompassing 602 individuals, 276 SLE and 326 RA patients. Subclinical atherosclerosis (presence of carotid plaques and carotid intima-media thickness [cIMT]) was determined by carotid ultrasonography. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether classic cardiovascular-related risk factors differentially influence subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in SLE compared to RA patients. RESULTS: Age (interaction factor [if] p=0.000), hypertension (if p=0.034), and diabetes (if p=0.037) had a higher effect on cIMT in RA than in SLE subjects. However, these traditional cardiovascular factors did not yield different effects on the presence of carotid plaques in RA and SLE when the univariate interaction was analysed. In addition, no differences were found in the influence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia or current smoking on cIMT or carotid plaque after adjusting for demographics, the presence of other traditional cardiovascular factors, and disease-related data. Moreover, the additive effect of several cardiovascular risk factors on the subclinical carotid atherosclerosis did not differ between the two diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on cIMT and carotid plaque is similar in RA and SLE.